5 Universal Truths to Ponder when setting New Year’s Resolution(s)

The New Year is just around the corner, which means it is time to decide on a New Year’s Resolution.  I find myself wondering if I should even make one.  After all, I’ve seen some stats that suggest 92% of them won’t be kept anyway.  Honestly, as I look back over my track record of keeping past New Year’s Resolutions, my record isn’t stellar either.

Nonetheless, the whole thought of this caused me to do some personal reflection.  I reviewed all areas of my life–relationships, spirituality, finances, career, hobbies etc.   I not only considered how satisfied I am with the current state  of these areas in my life, I also dared to ask how I’d like them to be.  This reminded me of  some universal truths I’ve learned and accepted over the years.

1.  My world today is a reflection of decisions and actions from my past. (or lack of decisions/lack of actions).

2.  New results require new actions.

3.  Successful people set clear, measurable, time-bound goals.

4.  The world is abundant, and everything I need to reach my goals is already available to me.

5.  Success is not a linear path.

Question—So am I going to set a New Year’s Resolution?

Answer–Is the Pope Catholic?

Advertisements

December 30, 2011 at 8:00 am Leave a comment

Are you paying attention? The Healthcare Reform Proposal.

Wow–from stepping lightly into communicating with the world to marching right into a political opinion.  I’m probably moving about as far along the continuum of a controversial pendulum in a 24 hour period of time as is humanely possible. However, the Healthcare Reform is high on my radar these days. I fear most Americans haven’t really tried to understand the bill, even though they understand this is  truly a key event  in the history of our country and certainly worthy of our attention.

It’s no secret.   I think the hotly debated Healthcare Reform has the same potential as “No Child Left Behind” to actually make things better.  Nonetheless I have to admit, at the surface level, it is easy to embrace the intent behind both pieces of legislation.  After all, who could argue with desirability of the idea that all Americans enjoy access to high quality health care or that all students perform at high levels?  But make no mistake, this is another example of trying to treat the symptoms rather than address root cause(s).

While I realize the proposed bill still has a long road to final approval, and it will likely undergo many iterations, here are  five surprising issues  you might want to know:

1.  The proposed bill would prohibit insurers from denying coverage to persons with pre-existing conditions.  WHAT????  Do you understand the business model upon which insurance companies maintain profitability and thereby can stay in business?  Should we be concerned about persons who can’t qualify for private insurance?  Absolutely, but government intrusion into private sector, free-market business operations will make things worse not better, in the long-run. (If you think your premiums are high now, what do you think will happen to your premiums when your insurance provider is FORCED to provide coverage for all?)

2.  The highly publicized 46 million uninsured number is misleading.  It implies that 46 million Americans are unable to obtain coverage and furthermore, it suggests this is a chronic state for them.  The reality is that when you focus only on those American Citizens  who truly lack coverage for reasons beyond their control, it is probably closer to 8.5 million.  For further discussion on this matter visit, http://spectator.org/archives/2009/03/20/the-myth-of-the-46-million

3.  While proposed taxes to fund the initiative (the cost of which has yet to be quantified) and reduced Medicare benefits would take effect almost immediately, the coverage to the uninsured population for which this is seemingly designed won’t happen before 2013.

4.  Americans would be REQUIRED to carry insurance coverage or pay a fine, the maximum of which is currently about $750.  (Let’s see now.  I can pay thousands of dollars every year for coverage or I can pay a fine of $750 until which time I find I really need coverage.  Then I’ll play the “You have to insure me card.”   see #1.   Oh, now I’m beginning to see how this can save me money.  LOL)

5. The US Government will have direct,  real-time access to individual bank accounts for electronic funds transfer and there will be fines for failure to provide this information.  (Pg. 59 of the 1,000 + page of the original proposal)

I have many concerns with this far reaching bill which some critics have even suggested is unconstitutional.  However, I think I’ll close with a challenge to this esteemed group of readers to name the last government run program that saved money and provided better service, both of which are being touted as reasons for supporting the current healthcare reform.  In fact, if you take a step back in time, similar promises were made in the 60’s when Medicare was first introduced.  If you adjust for inflation, the cost of Medicare has already exceeded original estimates by more than 10x.

December 23, 2011 at 2:08 pm 5 comments

Social Networking–Cautiously Getting Started

It’s been a long hard path but my colleagues have finally ‘shamed’ me into participating in the ‘other side of the web.’  I’m referring to connecting, communicating and networking with others around the globe.  What has taken me soooo long?  Well, it has less to do with  resistance to change and more to do with practicality.  Let me explain.

I’m not one who is ‘wowed’ or sucked into the glitz and glimmer of new toys or processes.  In fact, I’m barely even an observer initially.  Until I see how something new allows me to be more efficient, or it allows me to do things that aren’t possible without embracing the ‘new’ processes or tools, I’m not terribly interested.  Additionally, I have to admit that I’m not totally enamored with the idea that the written word lives forever.  You can retract what you write, but I understand it never really goes away.

However, the day has come.  I’ve finally had to admit that social networking on the web is no longer an option.  Rather, it is a ‘must’ in this global economy.  I’ve always appreciated the power of networking, but I’ve finally had to admit that if limit ourselves to face-to-face connections, our potential will likely be greatly diminished.  So gone are the days when I’ve played the role of a supporting cast member behind a curtain of anonymity.

Of course, I would be remiss if I didn’t weave in a word about education with my first official blog post.  As I stated before, the idea of the permanency of what is posted on the web is a bit disconcerting to me.  I realize that kids, in many ways,  have lead the way with social networking online, but I fear many may not fully appreciate the potential downside of what they choose to share–not just from a safety standpoint but also from the perspective that they are creating a ‘picture’ of who they are, which could serve or hurt them in the future.  Unfortunately, there are probably too few educators versed enough in this social medium to help guide students in their decision making in this social medium.

Nonetheless, I’m onboard now–jumping in with both feet.  Maybe more educators will take the plunge too.

Coming soon…….. Deb Haneke on Facebook, Twitter, Plurk etc.  Is there no end?

December 22, 2011 at 3:06 pm 10 comments

Technology use in and outside of schools

Like much of the country, we’ve been plagued with miserable weather.  This morning when I arrived at the office, I had a large box of grant paperwork, my purse and my laptop computer to carry into the office.  I normally park at the far end of the parking lot but toting all of this the longer distance given the freezing fog was -well let’s say less than attractive.  So I pulled up to the door and unloaded everything before taking my normal parking spot out in the hinterlands.

As I headed to the office empty-handed, I was struck by a feeling of nakedness.  I rarely go anywhere without toting my laptop.  It is my lifeline.  It is half my brain.  I can hardly function without it.  So walking along, especially heading into work without the extra baggage was a very unnatural feeling.

I couldn’t help but be struck by the irony of the importance of technology in my world.  I remember the first computer we had at home.  It was a Commodore B128–remember Commodore Computers?  I believe this was their business model.  At that time, the hardware was large, the machines were slow, and quite frankly you couldn’t do very much on them if you didn’t want to program them yourself.  The long and short of it is, that I can actually remember thinking to myself,  “Hmph computers…  That will be a nonevent in my life.”  LOL

Fast forward to 2010.  What changed?  How have I become so dependent on a tool that looked useless to me when I was first introduced to it?  The answer is obvious.  Like most technologies, the computer evolved.  It is better, faster, cheaper, smaller etc.  But most importantly, I found AUTHENTIC uses for this tool that has enriched my life.  I would venture to guess that most persons in the business world would tell that computer technologies are indispensable in their worlds.

OK, so I’m finally to the point of my post.  If computers and related technologies are arguably indispensable for life in the 21st century and if schools are in the business of preparing kids for their future lives, why are computers (and related technologies) generally considered nice to have but optional in the daily educational activities of students?

January 12, 2011 at 5:16 pm 2 comments

Kevin Honeycutt–I need my teachers to learn.

Wow–this video created by a colleague really knocked my socks off.  The message sort of dovetails with my last post  that addressed challenges with restructuring  schools–specifically the concern that education isn’t embracing technology in the way that the world outside of schools has.

Enjoy!!

January 6, 2011 at 2:45 pm Leave a comment

5 Barriers to the Redesign of High Schools

Linda Mariotti, President of ASCD, wrote a compelling message in the November 2009 ASCD newsletter about the need for High School Redesign.  I was so impressed with this article that it continues to sit on top of the piles on my desk, and I’ve referenced it many times.  Key points she made include the need to explore meaningful graduation requirements, focusing on 21st century skills, and abandoning the outdated factory school model.  Finally, she emphasized that it is not about the amount of time spent in school but rather what is done with time–before, during and after school.  I agree with her on all points.

Regardless of where you live in America, it would be difficult to ignore the impact that technology and  globalization are having on our daily lives.  Yet, I would argue that we pretty much approach high school education very much like we always have.  We teach subjects in isolation and with very little connection to the outside world.  If technology is being used, often it is simply an automation of the past, but more often we have banned technology that we don’t know how to control.

I believe it was Don Tapscott who described what it is like for today’s youth to walk through the doors of their schools.  He described is as something to the effect of, “Goooing into slooowww motion.”  Think about it.  Until the time they walk through the doors of schools, they are bombarded with information and they are multi-tasking (if there is such a thing.).  They may be listening to music, texting with multiple friends, monitoring their e-mail and studying simultaneously.  This is in stark contrast to the standard operating procedure of most schools.

I would challenge any of you to take a mental, imaginary walk up and down the halls of any high school and peer into the classroom doors.  What do you expect to see?  I’ve asked many high school staff members this very question, and the answers vary very little.  Common responses include things like: the teacher standing at the front of the room delivering information, some students sleeping, some students gazing at the teacher and maybe taking notes etc.  The point is that student engagement is often sorely lacking.

Additionally, a colleague has asked thousands of educators a very simple question.  “If you were to ask high school students  what one word they would use to describe schools, what would it be?”  Without hesitation, it is pegged nearly every time.  The most common response is ‘boring.’  If boring is a desirable condition for learning, I think we’ve got it down pat.  Other common answers include irrelevant, like a prison and long.

So what keeps us from successfully transforming our high schools?

1.  An important function that schools provide society is custodial daycare.  In general, I think it is safe to say that communities are not ready for high schools that don’t consistently ‘house’ teenagers for the traditional school day.

2.  Tradition.  Never mind the fact that the world in which our kids are going to live and compete is dramatically different, we still fight the mentality that “It was good enough for me, and it is good enough for them.”  Some argue that our current educational practices created the greatest free country in the world.  While this may be true, times are different, which means we may now be preparing our kids for the past.

3.  To borrow from Jim Collin’s, “Good is the Enemy of Great.” In fact, it is quite amazing. Many parents will tell you that schools need to change, but not the school their kids attend.  In fact, they’ll say the schools in their neighborhood are pretty good.

4.  Everybody has an experience with schools and therefore has an opinion and picture of what schools should be.  The general public is not opposed to change in education, until it looks dramatically different from their experience or picture of what education looks like.

5.  For some reason, despite the data, we continue to believe that the ultimate is for all kids to go to college so our curriculum continues to cater to a college prep curriculum.  If you doubt this, check and see what the first cuts are during economic downturns.  I’m not anti-college, I just recognize that only about 25-30% of the job opportunities require a college degree, while 60-70% require training beyond high school.  On the other hand, very few opportunities exist for individuals without some skills/knowledge development beyond high school.

In short, preparing today’s youth for the world in which they’ll live will require SYSTEMIC CHANGES (not tweaking the current system) to foster the kind of learning environment conducive to preparing students to access, analyze and apply information to solve both predictable and unpredictable real life problems.

January 4, 2011 at 7:39 pm Leave a comment

This Blog has Been Moved

This blog has been moved to http:BecauseOurFutureDependsOnIt.Wordpress.com

March 10, 2010 at 2:08 pm Leave a comment

Older Posts


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 4 other followers